All Posts

The air quality NPPF 2026 change worth understanding first is a structural one: air quality no longer has a paragraph of its own. It is now one limb of policy P3, "Living conditions and pollution", in Chapter 17, sitting alongside noise, artificial light, water and soil. The August 2026 Framework replaces the December 2024 version, and while the direction of travel is familiar, several of the words that changed will change what your assessment has to demonstrate. Where air qu

Basement development under the NPPF 2026 got harder to argue, and not because the Framework changed its mind about basements. The classification is the same as it always was. What moved is where the consequences are written down: the August 2026 Framework, which paragraph 1 confirms replaces the December 2024 version, brings the flood risk vulnerability matrix into Annex F. Paragraph 9 states that the annexes are also national planning policy. Basement dwellings sit in the Hi

Sustainable drainage now has a policy of its own. SuDS NPPF 2026 requirements sit at policy F8 in Chapter 18, and they ask for more than the December 2024 Framework did: design in accordance with the Defra National Standards, maintenance arrangements for the anticipated lifetime of the development, and a new national information requirement at Annex C for a statement showing how those standards have been achieved. This post covers what changed, who it catches, and how it affe

The August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework gives climate change a chapter of its own. NPPF 2026 climate change policy now sits in Chapter 5 as three numbered policies, CC1 to CC3, separated from the flood risk policies that used to share the same chapter. Only two of those three apply to planning applications. This post sets out what moved, what is genuinely new, and what a case officer will expect your submission to demonstrate. What changed from NPPF December 2024 U

The sequential test under NPPF 2026 has been rewritten in a way that genuinely helps applicants, and almost nobody is using it yet. Policy F5 of the August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework now caps the geographical area over which alternative sites must be searched — a limit that did not exist in December 2024 — and adds a new exemption route for sites at risk from surface water only. It also carries a trap, because being exempt from the sequential test is not the same

If you are preparing an NPPF 2026 flood risk assessment, the document you are writing to has changed shape. The August 2026 National Planning Policy Framework, subtitled "Plan-making and national decision-making policies", runs to 130 pages and opens by confirming at paragraph 1 that it "replaces the previous National Planning Policy Framework published in December 2024". Flood risk has been lifted out of the old combined climate chapter and given a chapter of its own, and on

BREEAM Version 7 introduces the most dramatic air quality requirement change: Outstanding rated buildings cannot include fossil fuel combustion on-site. Gas boilers, oil heating, and LPG systems are banned regardless of efficiency or NOx performance. This fundamental shift towards heat pumps and renewable heating creates design challenges, cost implications, and strategic decisions for projects targeting top ratings from 2025 onwards.

BREEAM Version 7 dramatically increases surface water management expectations, raising brownfield run-off improvement from 30% to 50%, introducing a new volume reduction credit, and mandating water quality monitoring throughout development lifetime. Projects registered from 2025 must design substantially larger SuDS infrastructure with verifiable long-term performance. Understanding these changes determines whether your drainage strategy achieves target credits and ratings.

BREEAM Version 7 fundamentally changes flood risk assessment requirements, introducing mandatory minimum standards for higher ratings, increased climate change allowances to +45%, and significantly enhanced resilience specifications. Projects registered from 2025 onwards must demonstrate genuine climate adaptation, not just regulatory compliance. Understanding these changes early determines whether Excellent or Outstanding ratings remain achievable for your site.

BREEAM Version 7 brings significant changes to pollution credits, with stricter minimum standards, enhanced flood resilience requirements, and a complete ban on fossil fuel combustion for Outstanding ratings. Understanding these changes is essential for projects starting in 2025 and beyond. This comprehensive guide explains every pollution credit update and what it means for your development.

Pol 01 addresses the global warming impact of refrigerants used in cooling, air conditioning, and refrigeration systems. Whilst these systems are essential for modern buildings, the refrigerants they contain can have global warming potentials thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide if released to atmosphere. BREEAM Pol 01 rewards developments that minimise this impact through careful refrigerant selection and leak prevention. This credit applies only to buildings with

Complete guide to BREEAM Pol 02 air quality credits: NOx emission thresholds, heating system specifications, achieving up to 3 credits through low-emission design in UK New Construction 2018.

Pol 03 represents one of the most significant credit opportunities in BREEAM's Pollution category, offering up to 5 credits plus 1 exemplary for developments that demonstrate proper flood risk management and sustainable surface water control. For projects on constrained urban sites or in flood-prone locations, these credits often determine whether you achieve Good or Very Good ratings. This credit appears across BREEAM UK New Construction 2018 schemes and rewards three disti

What actually happens during a flood risk assessment? Beyond identifying flood zones, professional consultants analyse water depth, flow velocity, debris impact and flood duration from rivers, surface water, groundwater and sewers. We use LiDAR data and hydraulic modelling to map exactly where water will flow during extreme events. For developments in Flood Zones 2 or 3, FRA is legally required for planning permission. Even properties in Flood Zone 1 benefit from professional

There's a quiet revolution happening in how we think about new developments. For years, the bar was set at "do no harm" – don't make air quality worse than it already is. But increasingly, particularly in London, planners are asking a more ambitious question: can new development actually improve the air we breathe? That's the thinking behind Air Quality Positive design, and it's changing how architects, developers, and engineers approach large-scale projects. What Does Air Qu

When you've lived through a flood, you never forget it. The smell of damp that lingers for months, the endless phone calls with insurance companies, the sight of your belongings piled on the pavement. But what if there was a way to bounce back faster – or even stop some of that damage happening in the first place? That's where property flood resilience comes in. Understanding Property Flood Resilience Property flood resilience (often shortened to PFR) refers to the modificati

If you're planning construction, demolition, or major earthworks, you've probably been told you need an Air Quality Dust Risk Assessment. Commonly referred to as an AQDRA, this document has become a standard requirement for most development sites across the UK – and for good reason. Construction dust isn't just a nuisance; it affects public health, damages property, and can cause serious ecological harm if not properly controlled. Getting the AQDRA right matters. A poor asse

If you're planning development in London, you've probably encountered the term "air quality neutral" and wondered what it actually involves. The short answer? Every development in Greater London now needs to demonstrate it won't make air pollution worse. The slightly longer answer is that getting this wrong can derail your planning application, so it's worth understanding what's required. Air quality neutral is a London Plan policy designed to prevent the incremental worsenin

If you've recently been told your development needs "SuDS", you're probably wondering what on earth that means and why nobody can just use normal drainage anymore. Fair question. The answer's actually more straightforward than you'd think, though getting it right takes a bit more effort than just connecting to the nearest sewer. SuDS stands for Sustainable Drainage Systems – essentially a way of managing rainwater that works with nature rather than fighting against it. And wh

Let's be honest – nobody wakes up excited about flood risk assessments. But if you're buying a property, planning a development, or your architect's just mentioned something about "fluvial flooding", you're probably realising this isn't something you can ignore. The question isn't really whether flood risk matters. It's whether you need a flood risk consultant to help you deal with it, or if there's a simpler route. Here's what you need to know. What Does a Flood Risk Consult